This flips the neutrality assumption on its head in a useful way. The Moody's analogy clarifies it well, nobody trusts a credit agency that won't publish its methodology. When I've seen people struggle with multi-agent systems, its usually because they expected one "right answer" instead of seeing divergence as the actuall signal.
This flips the neutrality assumption on its head in a useful way. The Moody's analogy clarifies it well, nobody trusts a credit agency that won't publish its methodology. When I've seen people struggle with multi-agent systems, its usually because they expected one "right answer" instead of seeing divergence as the actuall signal.
Exactly! The goal isn't consensus, it's explained disagreement. That's where the insight lives.